Legal Opinion

Monts v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 19, 1993No. CR 92-1338PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of rape and then pled guilty to the charges of burglary and criminal attempt to commit rape. He subsequently filed a Rule 37 motion seeking post-conviction relief alleging he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied appellant’s petition, and appellant now appeals that ruling. Appellant argues that his trial attorney, Bill McArthur, improperly failed to file a timely speedy-trial motion, asking appellant’s charges be dismissed. He further claims McArthur obtained trial continuances that appellant never approved.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Knappenberger v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Spivey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Stanley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Noel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Camargo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Sanford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API