Legal Opinion
Echols v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 30, 2003No. CR 99-1060PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
Appellant Damien Wayne Echols appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37. His prior appeal of this matter was reversed and remanded for the trial court to enter a written order in compliance with Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.5(i). See Echols v. State, 344 Ark. 513, 42 S.W.3d 467 (2001) (Echols II). The trial court has completed its written order, and the matter is now before us for a decision on the merits. We find no error and affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
The gruesome, disturbing facts of these crimes were…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Isom v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.