Legal Opinion

Osgerby v. Tuscola Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1964No. Calendar 11, 12, Docket 50,052, 50,053PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

By this original mandamus action, as in Peasley v. Lapeer Circuit Judge, 373 Mich 222, plaintiffs seek our condemnation of an order for the separation of issues for separate submission to and decision by a jury.

The plaintiffs here were plaintiffs below in consolidated actions against Michigan Mutual Liability Company for fraud and deceit. The basis of their actions was that the insurance company made fraudulent representations regarding the settlement of a personal injury claim they had against the village of Caro, insured by the defendant company; that relying upon such misrepresentations,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bement v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hughes v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Peasley v. Lapeer Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Yarger v. City of HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Fabbrini Family Foods, Inc. v. United Canning Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Jemaa v. MacGregor Athletic ProductsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Kita v. MatuszakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Danyo v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API