Legal Opinion

Georgia Pacific Corp. v. Ray

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 13, 1981No. 81-93PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

This is a workers’ compensation case. The commission held that the respondent-claimant could not invoke the 15% penalty for an alleged violation of a safety statute, that he was not entitled to an award for disability to the body as a whole, and that he could not hold petitioner-employer liable for additional medical expenses. The court of appeals affirmed the commission except with respect to the alleged violation of the safety statute. Ray v. Georgia Pacific Corp., 1 Ark. App. 196, 614 S.W. 2d 676 (1981). We granted certiorari since the interpretation of certain statutes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harber v. ShowsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Ryan v. NapaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Buckeye Cotton Oil v. McCoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Ray v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. AG Processing, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Bemberg Iron Works v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Eury v. NC EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'NCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Second Injury Fund v. Fraser-Owens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Eury v. North Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API