Legal Opinion

Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Dunnington

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1926No. 15189PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DICKSON, O.

Tbe parties w.ill be referred tcrf as plaintiff and defendant as they were designated in the trial court, inverse to the order in which they appear in this court.

On the 26th day of August, 1922, the plaintiff, as administrator ' of the esrate of Roy Messick, deceased, commenced this action in the district court of Allfalfa county against the defendant, to recover double tbe value of certain machinery alleged' to have been wrongfully embezzled and alienated by the defendant after the death of the said Roy Messick and before the appointment of the administrate!.' of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Aultman & Taylor MacHinery Co. v. FussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Litz v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  4. Secrest v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Simons v. Brashears Transfer and StorageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Helfinstine v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. In Re Wagner's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Culbertson v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Chard v. DarlingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API