Legal Opinion

Secrest v. Wood

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1924No. 12784PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAT, C.

The question here is. Can the mortgagee, after maturity of the mortgage indebtedness, maintain an action of replevin for possession of the mortgaged property against the surviving wife of the deceased mortgagor, where no executor or administrator has been appointed?

May 14, 1917, .T, C. Wood mortgaged one cow and calf t.o Henry Secrest to secure the payment of two notes of $12.50 each, due June 14 and July 14, 1917, respectively. Thereafter Mrs. Wood left Wagoner county, where all the parties at the time resided, and removed the mortgaged property into Muskogee county in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Litz v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Smith-Wogan Hardware & Imp. Co. v. BiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nichols & Shepard Co. v. DunningtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. American State Bank v. HoldingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. First Nat. Bank v. OgdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API