Legal Opinion

Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. Eaton & Prince Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 2, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, for money due on contract. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Abner Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

This was a suit instituted by appellee to recover for the part performance of a contract entered into with appellant for the erection of an elevator in a building occupied by appellant. The case was tried below by the court without a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts, and a judgment was rendered in favor of appellee for $1,390, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The statement of facts, and material portions of the contract which was a part thereof, were as follows:

“It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the plaintiff and defendant entered into the contract hereto annexed on the first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. SaundersIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Nelson v. Pickwick Associated Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  3. Cleary v. SohierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Johnston v. Ewing Female UniversityIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Rawson v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago Edison Co. v. Huyett & Smith Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  2. Chicago Edison Co. v. Huyett & Smith Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API