Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Lance M. Freeman (98-6636), Donald W. Adams (98-6637)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 23, 2000No. 98-6636, 98-6637Published

1ConcurrenceClay, Circuit Judge

I concur in the majority opinion reversing the district court’s denial of Defendants’ motion to suppress the evidence on the basis that the police officers lacked probable cause to stop the Winnebago. I write separately concerning what may be a troubling pattern or practice by some members of the Shelby County Sheriffs Department drug interdiction squad of stopping “target” vehicles on questionable probable cause grounds in this area of Tennessee in order to search for contraband. Although it is true that under Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996) and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. Cecil FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. James Erwin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API