Legal Opinion
In Re Imperial Irr. Dist.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 2, 1935No. 24664-MPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
To avail itself of the remedial provisions of the National Bankruptcy Act as amended by adding section 80 of chapter 9 thereof, approved May 24, 1934 (11 USCA § 303), Imperial Irrigation District, a public agency and taxing district within Imperial County, state of California, pursuant to a duly adopted resolution of its board of directors, and on September 10, 1934, filed in this court a verified petition for readjustment of its debts.
It is alleged therein that Imperial Irrigation District, hereinafter called the “District,” is unable to meet its debts as they…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hanover National Bank v. MoysesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Merced Irr. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1939
- In re City of West Palm BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Ashton v. Cameron County Water Improvement Dist. No. OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- In re Imperial Irr. DistDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
- In re James Irr. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.