Legal Opinion

United States v. Nigro

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 29, 1989No. 61,149; NMCM 87 4188PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial with members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of one specification each alleging conspiracy to commit larceny and forgery; 1-day absence without leave; willful disobedience of an order of an officer; wrongful appropriation of a privately-owned vehicle; 15 specifications alleging the unlawful making and uttering of bad checks; 2 specifications of forgery; and 11 specifications of dishonorable failure to maintain sufficient funds in a checking account, in violation of Articles 81, 86, 90, 121, 123a, 123,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SmartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. Roger R. Ploof and George J. GodinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. ReichardtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. HargroveUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. HamiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. DinataleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. United States v. CombsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. TurnerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API