Legal Opinion
Interdiction of F.T.E.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1993No. 24669-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDSAY, Judge.
The respondent, F.T.E., appeals a trial court judgment ordering his estate to bear the cost of attorney fees and expenses incurred by the petitioner in connection with a limited interdiction. We amend and, as amended, affirm the trial court judgment.
FACTS
This case was previously before the court following the involuntary judicial commitment and interdiction of F.T.E. See Interdiction of F.T.E., 594 So.2d 480 (La.App.2d Cir.1992). F.T.E., who is in his mid-50’s, suffers from multiple sclerosis, a degenerative neurological disorder. He has been bedridden for more than 10 years,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- STATE, DOTD v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Moore v. RoemerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- State in Interest of JAVSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Huddleston v. Bossier Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Efner v. KetteringhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re CristinaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Interdiction of SperandeoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012