Legal Opinion

Golden Condor, Inc. v. Bell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1987No. 16461Published

1Opinion of the Court

739 P.2d 385 (1987)

112 Idaho 1086

GOLDEN CONDOR, INC., an Idaho corporation, Plaintiff-respondent,

v.

Velma G. BELL, Defendant-appellant.

No. 16461.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 17, 1987.

Velma G. Bell, pro se.

Hull, Hull, & Branstetter, Wallace, for plaintiff-respondent; Piatt Hull argued.

BAKES, Justice.

Pro se appellant, Velma Bell, appeals from a judgment of the district court which, after remand from the Court of Appeals, again quieted title to four unpatented mining claims in respondent, Golden Condor, Inc. Mrs. Bell contends that the district court's decision on remand is not supported by the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Masters v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Nycum v. Triangle Dairy Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Pointner v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API