Golden Condor, Inc. v. Bell
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
739 P.2d 385 (1987)
112 Idaho 1086
GOLDEN CONDOR, INC., an Idaho corporation, Plaintiff-respondent,
v.
Velma G. BELL, Defendant-appellant.
No. 16461.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
June 17, 1987.
Velma G. Bell, pro se.
Hull, Hull, & Branstetter, Wallace, for plaintiff-respondent; Piatt Hull argued.
BAKES, Justice.
Pro se appellant, Velma Bell, appeals from a judgment of the district court which, after remand from the Court of Appeals, again quieted title to four unpatented mining claims in respondent, Golden Condor, Inc. Mrs. Bell contends that the district court's decision on remand is not supported by the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Masters v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Nycum v. Triangle Dairy Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Pointner v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.