Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Unger v. Ziemniak

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 27, 1989No. Misc. No. 89-05Published

1ConcurrenceCox, Judge

As I stated in United States v. Cole, 24 MJ 18, 27 (CMA), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 97, 98 L.Ed.2d 58 (1987), “[I]t is fundamental black-letter law that every court has the power to determine the question of its jurisdiction over the persons and subject matter coming before it.” Accordingly, it was appropriate for us to entertain Lieutenant Unger’s petition for extraordinary relief. Having heard her complaint, I am now satisfied that her case does not warrant this Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over an “ordinary” special court-martial not empowered to sentence her to be dismissed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. Dobzynski v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. Jones v. Commander, Naval Air Force, U.S. Atlantic FleetUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API