McCrossen v. Star Auto Service, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GAUDIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment which amended and revised an automobile insurance policy. The decree in effect invalidated a business use exclusion and then lessened the policy limits to the statutory minimum.
For the following reasons, we affirm that part of the judgment which in effect voided the business use exclusion but we set aside the reduction of policy limits to the statutory minimum, which is $10,000.00/$20,000.00. We remand for further proceedings.
Initially, we note that this case comes to us as a result of a judgment which is interlocutory in nature. The trial judge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rudison v. RichardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Arnaud v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Cinquemano v. UnderwoodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marcus v. Hanover Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Burgos v. STAR AUTO SERVICE, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Marcus v. Hanover InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998