Legal Opinion

Willett v. Midfirst Bank (In Re Willett)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1996No. 19-20688PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WARREN W. BENTZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue before the Court is what interest rate should be applied to arrearages on a debt secured by a mortgage on the Debtors’ residence, to be cured by installment payments over the term of a Chapter 13 Plan. The Debtors propose the state judgment rate of 6%; the mortgagee proposes the contract rate of 10%, which it alleges is also the current market rate of interest.

The Debtor does not assert that 10% is incorrect as the market rate of interest. The Debtor instead posits that a 6% rate “represents a ‘benchmark’ that is deemed fair and equitable.”

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Joseph C. Taddeo and Ellen A. Taddeo, Debtors. Elfriede Di Pierro v. Joseph C. Taddeo and Ellen A. Taddeo and Richard J. McCord Interim TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. In re ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Alphonso Jones, Debtor, Robert M. Wood, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Stendardo v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re GibsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. In Re MilesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Rogel v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (In Re Rogel)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API