Legal Opinion

McNichols v. People ex rel. Cook

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 28, 1934No. 13,511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as the auditor, defendant in error as Cook, and the City and County of Denver as the city.

Salaries of members of the police department are fixed in the city charter. By ordinance they were reduced ten per cent. The auditor tendered Cook, a police sergeant, a warrant for the first half of his January, 1934, salary, less the reduction. Cook refused the warrant and brought mandamus to compel payment at the charter rate. The alternative writ was issued and on final hearing was made peremptory. To review that judgment the auditor brings error.

Article…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McDonald v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. State ex rel. Quintin v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Doherty v. County of RansomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Moore v. Humboldt CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. RinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Bowman v. EldherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  3. McNichols v. Police Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. City & County of Denver v. RinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Rogers v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API