Legal Opinion

Cooperman v. One Bancorp

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 17, 1991No. Civ. No. 89-0315-PPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.

This securities fraud action is back before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for *528class certification pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As discussed below, the Court grants the motion in part.

I. Background

Plaintiffs bring this action against The One Bancorp (a bank holding company), individual directors and officers of The One Bancorp, and Ernst & Young (the successor in interest to The One Bancorp’s accounting firm).1 Plaintiffs allege that in the period between March 4, 1988 and September 29, 1989 inclusive…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Andrews v. Bechtel Power Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Zirn v. VLI Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  2. Gaffin v. Teledyne, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Cooke v. Manufactured Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Weld v. Glaxo Wellcome Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. O'Neil v. AppelDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API