Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Beemer

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1950No. 3628PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

EATHER, J.:

This application for a writ of mandamus presents squarely for determination the constitutionality of an act of the legislature applying to Washoe County alone, and dividing that county into two commissioner districts.

Petitioner alleges that he is a citizen, taxpayer and legally qualified voter of Washoe County; that respondent is the county clerk and ex officio clerk of the board of county commissioners of said county and is charged with the duty of accepting and filing a declaration of candidacy from any qualified individual who desires to be a candidate for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washoe County Water Conservation District v. BeemerNevada Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Patterson v. DonovanNevada Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Singleton v. Eureka CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Fall v. KelsoNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Kearns v. StreshleyNevada Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Masto v. Gypsum Resources, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. County of Clark v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State ex rel. Bible v. MaloneNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Town of Pahrump v. County of NyeNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Goodwin v. City of SparksNevada Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API