Keil v. Wilson
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Justice.
Plaintiff (appellee) sued appellants (defendants) on, two promissory notes, and recovered judgment for principal, interest and attorney fees against appellants. Plaintiff alleged that defendants had wrongfully obtained possession of the notes and refused to yield up possession of the same.
Defendants denied execution of one of the notes and alleged that if such note ever existed it was barred by the statute of limitations.
The Court, sitting without a jury, did not find that the note was wrongfully obtained or withheld, but proceeded upon the theory that the note had been lost,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chesher v. Shafter Lake Clay Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Radcliffe v. ChavesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1910
- Telluric Co. v. BramerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Halford Ditch Co. v. Independent Ditch Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Romero v. HerrerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Levenson v. MobleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Bounds v. CarnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Luna v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Davis v. SeversonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Perschbacher v. MoseleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.