Legal Opinion

United States v. Maas

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 25, 2006No. 2:05-cr-00245PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ADELMAN, District Judge.

While hunting in North Dakota in 2003, defendant Scott Maas mistakenly shot two waterfowl out of season. Despite realizing his mistake, defendant transported the birds to Wisconsin where a state conservation warden observed them in a taxidermy shop. Law enforcement officials investigated and in January 2005 found a shotgun and a rifle in defendant’s home. 1 Because defendant had been convicted of felony theft in May 1999, he could not possess firearms. The government charged defendant with possessing firearms as a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and transporting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Francisco Javier HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Marcos Salgado-OcampoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Michael Anthony ShellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Michael Daniel KayfezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Rick WaggonerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MaasDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006
  2. United States v. LemieuxDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API