Legal Opinion
United States v. Maas
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 5, 2006No. 2:05-cv-00245PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SENTENCING MEMORANDUM
ADELMAN, District Judge.
The government charged defendant Michael Maas with transferring a firearm to a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1), and trans porting in interstate commerce wildlife taken in violation of state law, 16 U.S.C. §§ 3372 & 3373. He pleaded guilty to the wildlife count but went to trial on the firearm count. I found him guilty following a court trial.
The probation office prepared a pre-sentence report (“PSR”), which calculated his base offense level on the firearm count as 14, U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(6)(B), then applied a 2 level enhancement under § 3C1.1 because…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Marius CanoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Barbara E. Stefonek, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Devon RocheCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Byron Keith ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HeinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2006