VEIKOS v. TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CATHRINE VEIKOS, Case No. 2:20-cv-04408-JDW , v. TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, . MEMORANDUM Juries are the bedrock of the American justice system. So in posttrial motions after a jury verdict, judges have to strike a balance. On the one hand, we have to avoid playing Monday morning quarterback and second-guessing a jury’s verdict. Otherwise, jury trials become de facto advisory verdicts. On the other hand, we have to guard against jury decisions that are irrational. The jury system can’t become a game…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dorothy Daniels v. Philadelphia School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- LeBoon v. Lancaster Jewish Community Center Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.