Legal Opinion
Macy v. GC Services Ltd. Partnership
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 6, 2017No. Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-819-DJH-CHLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
David J. Hale, Judge, United States District Court
Plaintiffs Wilbur Macy and Pamela Stowe allege that Defendant GC Services Limited Partnership violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by sending them debt-collection letters that did not accurately convey their rights under the Act. (Docket No. 1) They now seek certification of a class consisting of similarly situated debtors. (D.N. 22) Because GC Services’ opposition to certification primarily rests on its contention that the plaintiffs lack standing—a position the Court rejected in a previous opinion (D.N.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilbur Macy v. GC Services Ltd. P'shipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Dickens ex rel. Estate v. GC Servs. Ltd.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
- McNamee v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021