Legal Opinion
St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 2012No. Nos. B229345, B231919PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (St. Paul Mercury), the general liability insurer for the general contractor, sought equitable contribution from Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Mountain West), the insurer for the framing subcontractor, based on an additional insured endorsement in Mountain West’s policy naming the general contractor. The trial court ruled in favor of St. Paul Mercury and ordered Mountain West to contribute $2,087,171.50, plus interest in the amount of $372,731.73, to the *650defense and settlement costs St. Paul Mercury…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Acceptance Insurance v. Syufy EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Stonewall Insurance v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Cont'l Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Khavarian Enterprises, Inc. v. Commline, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Imperium Insurance v. Unigard InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Jon Davler, Inc. v. Arch Insurance CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Am. States Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of Pa.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.