Legal Opinion
Inland Power & Light Co. v. Grieger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 16, 1937No. 8130PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
In an action brought by appellees to recover damages for injury to their land caused by overflowing river water, which injury was asserted to be the result of appellant’s negligence, judgment- -was rendered in favor of appellees, from which appellants have perfected this appeal.
*813Appellee Fay Grieger purchased approximately 101 acres of land in Clark county, Wash., in November, 1920. Upon this land since that time, appellees have maintained a dairying business. The property is located at a bend in the Lewis river. The soil was silty loam, which, the testimony shows, “is the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- The MajesticSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kreigh v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- CARLSON v. A. & P. Corrugated Box Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Danzansky v. ZimbolistCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Cover v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Robert R. Buntin, Claude Overton, C. P. Long, Jr., and R. W. Thompson, Jr. v. Mike FletchasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Russell v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.