Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Slade
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
By a bill of interpleader, the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company invoked the aid of the Court to require the defendants, who are adverse claimants to a fund in its possession in which it claims no interest, to interplead their respective claims in this action to the end that the plaintiff might obtain the relief usually accorded a disinterested stakeholder in such proceedings. Facts requisite to Federal jurisdiction under the Interpleader Act of January 20, 1936, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(26), are appropriately alleged. The fund in controversy has been paid into the Registry of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Osaka Shosen Kaisha Line v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Mutual Ben. Life Ins. v. SwettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Transamerica Premier Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994