Hingle v. Gann

This is a boundary line dispute. The appellant frames the issue here as follows:

"Whether a party can specifically plead that a boundary line between a coterminous landowner is a section line and subsequently have the boundary line established solely on a claim of adverse possession without regard to the section line and without prior notice to the defendant." Unquestionably, plaintiff did allege that:

"4. Plaintiffs aver that the true boundary line separating their property from that of the defendant is the Eastern Boundary line of Section 26, Township 16, Range 3 East, which said boundary…