Legal Opinion

Rushton v. McLaughlin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1925No. 3 Div. 709PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMilleb, J.

This is a statutory bill in equity by Elwood McLaughlin against Theo W. McLaughlin and others to quiet title to a city lot in Montgomery, particularly described in the bill, which was filed as permitted by the statutes. Sections 9905, 9906, Code 1923. There was decree pro confesso against all the respondents, except the three minors, Theo Gunter Elmore, Henry Elwood McLaughlin, and Graham Bushton. A guardian ad litem was appointed by the court to represent the three minors. He filed for them an answer denying the averments of the bill. The court by decree granted complainant relief, held he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abney v. AbneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & I. Co. v. CappsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ChildressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Barry v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  3. Ward v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Garrett v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Hingle v. GannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API