Legal Opinion

Vann Rowland v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 30, 1987No. 1055PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court deciding that, under applicable federal law, an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) is not exempt from levy or attachment by a judgment creditor. We affirm.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, provides: “Each pension plan shall provide that benefits provided under the plan may not be assigned or alienated.” 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d)(1).

ERISA applies, by its terms, to “employee benefit plan[s].” 29 U.S.C. § 1003(a). An employee benefit plan is defined as “any plan, fund, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bartlett Cooperative Ass'n v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. Citizens Bank of Ashburn v. ShinglerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Smith v. Winter Park Software Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc. v. MacKeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re KometUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
  2. In Re DamastUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Williams v. Texas Commerce Bank-First State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989
  4. Gianotti v. Barucci, No. 181644 (Oct. 24, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API