Vann Rowland v. Strickland
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Sanders, Chief Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court deciding that, under applicable federal law, an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) is not exempt from levy or attachment by a judgment creditor. We affirm.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, provides: “Each pension plan shall provide that benefits provided under the plan may not be assigned or alienated.” 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d)(1).
ERISA applies, by its terms, to “employee benefit plan[s].” 29 U.S.C. § 1003(a). An employee benefit plan is defined as “any plan, fund, or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bartlett Cooperative Ass'n v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Citizens Bank of Ashburn v. ShinglerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Smith v. Winter Park Software Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc. v. MacKeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re KometUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
- In Re DamastUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
- Williams v. Texas Commerce Bank-First State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989
- Gianotti v. Barucci, No. 181644 (Oct. 24, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990