Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fuel Exploration, Inc. v. Novotny

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1985No. 84-433Published

1DissentCaporale, J.

I agree that the Novotnys are in no position to complain of the working interest owners’ intervention in this case. I also agree that the working interest owners are and were the owners of the equipment when Fuel Exploration commenced this replevin action and that Fuel Exploration was and is not. I further agree that the equipment never lost its character as chattels and that the Novotnys therefore never acquired therein any interest whatsoever.

Yet, I dissent because I consider the result reached, although perhaps “fair” in the sense that it allows the owners to recover possession from those…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DrawbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Bank of Keystone v. KaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Robinson v. Kilpatrick-Koch Dry Goods Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Griffing v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API