Fuel Exploration, Inc. v. Novotny
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentCaporale, J.
I agree that the Novotnys are in no position to complain of the working interest owners’ intervention in this case. I also agree that the working interest owners are and were the owners of the equipment when Fuel Exploration commenced this replevin action and that Fuel Exploration was and is not. I further agree that the equipment never lost its character as chattels and that the Novotnys therefore never acquired therein any interest whatsoever.
Yet, I dissent because I consider the result reached, although perhaps “fair” in the sense that it allows the owners to recover possession from those…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DrawbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Bank of Keystone v. KaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Robinson v. Kilpatrick-Koch Dry Goods Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Griffing v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.