Legal Opinion

The Elk

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 29, 1900No. 8PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

A libel was filed by Edward Mcll-vaine, master of the barge Elk, against the steam-tug Carbonero to recover damages resulting from a collision between the two vessels in the Delaware River on the night of December 9, 1895. Subsequently on the petition of the master of the Carbonero the steam-tug A. R. Cray was under rule 59 in admiralty made a party defendant. The Elk at the time of the collision was in tow of the Gray. The court below held that both, the Carbonero and the Cray were at fault, and decreed that the damages sustained by the libelant should be . equally…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Blue JacketSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. The ElkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tidewater Associated Oil Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
  2. The City of ReadingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API