Beazell v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
It is ordered and adjudged that this court does assume jurisdiction in deciding that it is discretionary for the trial judge to allow separate trials for those jointly indicted for the offense charged in the indictment therein, that the same applies to the remedy and manner of trial and the defendant George H. Beazell, plaintiff in error herein, has no vested right in the remedy or manner of trial provided by law, even though same may have been different at the date of the commission of the offense, and it is further ordered and adjudged that the record contains a constitutional question…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. MuqdadyCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2000