Legal Opinion
Greenfield v. Pearlstein
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided February 28, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Sherman, PJ.
This is an action in three counts for the defendant’s alleged breach of an express and implied contract and unfair and deceptive practices in violation of G.L.c. 93A in refusing to pay his portion of the losses generated by the parties’ rental property.
The defendant filed a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. R., Rule 12(b) (6) motion to dismiss which, after the submission of affidavits by both parties, was properly treated by the trial court as a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. R., Rule 56 motion for summary judgment. Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 12(b). See also, Taplin v. Chatham, 390 Mass. 1,2…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- First Pennsylvania Mortgage Trust v. Dorchester Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Cousineau v. LarameeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Seemann v. EneixMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Marr Equipment Corp. v. I.T.O. Corp. of New EnglandMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Taplin v. Town of ChathamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- A. Spadafora Iron Works, Inc. v. Morse Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998