Wichman v. Benner
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The central issue in this appeal is whether an employer or insurance carrier may assign its statutory right to reimbursement of workers’ compensation benefits from the recovery of an injured employee against a third party. The superior court held that the right to reimbursement could be assigned and enforced for its full value, even if the assignee purchased it at a discount. This appeal also presents the question whether the superior court erred in granting the assignee’s motion to intervene after judgment to enforce the right to reimbursement. We affirm.
II…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. WeidnerAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Benner v. WichmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Fernandez v. Ford Motor Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scammon Bay Association, Inc. v. UlakAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Mat-Su Regional Medical Center, LLC v. BurkheadAlaska Supreme Court · 2010