Legal Opinion

State v. Mercado

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 5, 2014No. 31180-5-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFearing, J.

¶1 RCW 70.24.340(l)(c) authorizes a local health department to conduct human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing and counseling of a defendant found guilty of a drug offense if the court determines that the “related drug offense is one associated with the use of *627hypodermic needles.” Heather Mercado claims the trial court erred when ordering her to submit to HIV testing because the court did not determine that she used a hypodermic needle to ingest the methamphetamine for which she was convicted of possessing. The State of Washington argues that the trial court need not find that the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Charles BlufordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. State v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Ricky Lee Shies v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  4. Ricky Lee Shies v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  5. State Of Wa, Appellant/cross-respondent V. Timothy M. Kelly, Respondent/cross-appellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API