Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Love
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Application by the Kansas City Southern Railway Company for an order to J. E. Love, chairman, and the Corporation Commission, to certify facts on which a certain order issued by the commission was based.
Read the full summary
Application by the Kansas City Southern Railway Company for an order to J. E. Love, chairman, and the Corporation Commission, to certify facts on which a certain order issued by the commission was based. Original application for an order directing the chairman of the Corporation Commission, or said commission, to certify, under the seal of said commission, to this court, all of the facts upon which order No. 105 was based, and which may be essential for a proper decision of the appeal from said order, together with such evidence introduced before or considered by the commission in making said…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above). The following questions are raised in this case: (1) May an appeal be taken from a final order of the Corporation Commission on a record certified in accordance with the provisions of section 22, art. 9 (section 234, Bunn’s Ed.; page 259, Snyder’s Ed.), of the Constitution of Oklahoma? (2) When shall a supersedeas be 'issued after the time prescribed by the commission in its order for a certain facility to be furnished has expired?
The first question has been decided in the affirmative in the case of the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Muskogee Gas & Electric Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.