Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Love
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
■Original application by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Ee Railway Company for a writ of mandamus to be directed to J. E. Love, chairman, and the Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma. • - On the 19th day of December, A. D. 1908, the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company filed its petition in this court, alleging: (1) That it is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Kansas, and owning and operating a line of railway in the state of Oklahoma,…
Read the full summary
■Original application by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Ee Railway Company for a writ of mandamus to be directed to J. E. Love, chairman, and the Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma. • - On the 19th day of December, A. D. 1908, the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company filed its petition in this court, alleging: (1) That it is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Kansas, and owning and operating a line of railway in the state of Oklahoma, and is a common carrier for hire. That the defendant J. E. Love is chairman of the Corporation Commission of the state of…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The only question necessary to determine on this record is whether or not a motion- for a new trial and a case-made is prerequisite to the allowance of an appeal from a final order of the Corporation Commission.
Section 22, art. 9, Const. Okla. (section 234, Bunn’s Ed.; Snyder’s Ed. p. 259), provides that “in no case of appeal from the commission shall any new or additional evidence be introduced in the Supreme Court; but the chairman of the commission, under the seal of the commission, shall certify to the Supreme Court all the facts upon which the action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gaines v. MerrymanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Todd v. SykesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- Trapp, Auditor v. Wells-Fargo Express Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Porter v. BrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Magarity v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Muskogee Gas & Electric Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Garrison v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.