Legal Opinion
Easley Ex Rel. Estate of Easley v. Reuss
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 3, 2008No. 06-1646PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition FoR ReheaRING
2Per curiam
We grant the petition for rehearing to cure an administrative error: The order of September 14, 2007, was inadvertently issued without the final approval of all members of the panel. All of the panel members hereby adopt and approve the order issued on September 14, 2007.
In her petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, Ms. Easley requests that this court revisit its prior decision. We decline to do so, but we take this opportunity to explain our denial of further review in order to provide litigants with some guidance concerning the proper contents…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- King Ex Rel. King v. East St. Louis School District 189Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Gerda Dorothea Deweerth v. Edith Marks Baldinger, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, Wildenstein & Co., Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ben Herbert SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Monfils v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Island Creek Coal Co. v. Melyndia BryanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. ShaferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. PodhradskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- American Sales Co. v. AstraZeneca LPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Academy of Allergy & Asthma v. Amerigroup Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.