United States v. Ben Herbert Sutherland
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted Ben Herbert Sutherland on three counts relating to bank robbery. Because the District Court found that an impermissibly suggestive photographic identification created a substantial likelihood of misidentification, yet allowed the question of an in-court identification to go to the jury, we reverse and remand for a new trial. Other issues raised in this appeal which may arise on retrial are also considered.
I. BACKGROUND
Sutherland was indicted for conspiracy to rob unnamed banks,1 Bank robbery 2 and robbery with a dangerous weapon.3 He pleaded not guilty to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. TrefethenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- United States v. Erwin Edward Ballard, United States of America v. Richard Henry BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by156 opinions
- Bobby Lee Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- United States v. Fred Louis Bell and Charles Lavern BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Billy G. ByersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Robert J. L'hoste, R. J. L'Hoste & Company, Inc., Clarence Eugene Rogers and Marvin Cochran, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.