Legal Opinion

People v. Chavez

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 2012No. F061645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1276Opinion

WISEMAN, Acting P. J.

In connection with two separate incidents, defendant Pablo Mendoza Chavez was convicted of burglary, receipt of stolen property, conspiracy to commit burglary, theft with a prior theft conviction, and possession of burglary tools. The conviction of conspiracy to commit burglary was based on the entry of a coconspirator into a fenced wrecking yard to steal gasoline from a junk car.

Burglary requires entry into a building, but the jury was instructed that entry into the yard was sufficient. Although our Supreme Court has defined “building” broadly for purposes of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. JuradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  5. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Laduke, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. State v. Francis L. LampmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. Corona v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. LaDukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API