State v. Wethered
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
The defendant challenges the refusal of the court to suppress hashish that he handed to police officers without being informed of his rights. We affirm the Court of Appeals holding that the hashish is not suppressible under the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution and affirm the conviction for unlawful delivery of a controlled substance.
The essential facts are not disputed. At approximately 8 p.m. on May 17, 1985, Detective Dave Dohman was parked at the Marine Park boat launch area in Vancouver. In his undercover capacity, Dohman noticed Michael Wethered drive into the park in a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.