Huff v. Hall
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Hillsdale. (Howell, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover her alleged share in the proceeds of certain property, consisting of fifty acres of land in Adams, Hillsdale county, which she claims to have conveyed to him subject to a certain mortgage of $1354, and interest, upon the agreement that he would pay her the balance of any proceeds when he should sell it, and that it should not be sold for less than $3500, — she to have the use of it till sold. Plaintiff claims that defendant sold the property in March, 1878, to David Stebbins, of Toledo, and received in payment a house and lot in Toledo valued at $3500. The…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Ferguson v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Detroit v. Fidelity Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Hartwig v. RushingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.