Legal Opinion

Ex parte Corypus

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 18, 1925No. 9180PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

The petitioner was denied the privilege of landing in the United States on the ground that he is excluded by reason of Chinese descent. He prosecutes appeal, pending which he seeks to be enlarged on bail.

Section 5, Act May 5, 1892 (section 4319, Comp. St.), provides that a Chinese to whom the privilege of landing has been denied may not be enlarged on bail in the first instance on application to any judge or court of the United States. The first instance may be considered first presentation or proceeding leading up to and consideration of the answer to the writ. A…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wright v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. United States v. Mrs. Gue LimSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. In re Ah TaiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1903
  4. Chin Wah v. ColwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  5. United States v. Fah ChungDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GontizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Wallace v. MantheiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ex parte Fong Chow OiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1926
  4. Trusted Media Brands, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API