Legal Opinion
State v. Worsencroft
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 1995No. 94APA02-262PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tyack, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Arthur Dean Worsencroft, appeals from a jury verdict and judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas finding him guilty of six counts of Medicaid fraud in violation of R.C. 2913.40(B). Defendant asserts the following five assignments of error:
“I. The trial court erred to the prejudice of the appellant by overruling the appellant’s motions for judgment of acquittal made pursuant to Rule 29(A) & (C), Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure..
“II. The trial court erred to the prejudice of the appellant by improperly limiting the cross-examination of Brian…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GaryOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. Lowman Lumber Co., 22398 (1-9-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Frank v. The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati, OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021