Legal Opinion

State v. Lowman Lumber Co., 22398 (1-9-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 2009No. 22398PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant the State of Ohio appeals from the dismissal of its criminal complaint against defendant-appellee Lowman Lumber Company on double jeopardy grounds. The State contends that the trial court erred in concluding that sole proprietorships are not subject to criminal liability under R.C. 2901.23. We conclude that the trial court did not err in dismissing the charges against Lowman. A sole proprietorship has no legal identity separate from that of the individual owner, who is the actor in the eyes of the law. Where a criminal conviction has been obtained against the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clem D's Auto Sales v. Bur. of Motor VehiclesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API