Spreckels v. Graham
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
LAWLOR, J., Dissenting.
I dissent.
Plainly put, the effect of the decision is that only parties organized at the time of the preceding general election or one coming within paragraph (b), subdivision 9, section 1 of the direct primary law are entitled to have placed on the general ballot in the November election candidates for electors for President and Vice-President, and that since petitioners did not organize under said paragraph (b) they cannot nominate such electors. In other words, such independent voters not having affiliated with a party could have no voice, either in the May or August…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Hall v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Todd v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- State ex rel. Spofford v. GiffordIdaho Supreme Court · 1912