Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Reilly

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1891PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. F. Tuley, Judge,, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ckaig

James Reilly died in 1875, intestate, leaving a widow, Mary J. Reilly, and four children, Ellen A. Reilly, Frank J. Reilly, Joseph Reilly, and complainant, Cecelia Reilly, (a daughter by a former wife,) as his only-heirs. James Reilly died seized of the property described in the bill. In 1877, Ellen A. Reilly, aged four years, died. In 1881, Frank J. Reilly, aged twelve years, died. Cecelia Reilly filed this bill on October 8, 1885, against Mary J. Reilly and Joseph M. Reilly, in which she prayed for a partition of the property of which her father, James Reilly, died seized, and prayed that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blair v. ReadingIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Purdy v. HensleeIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Mohler v. WiltbergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Gage v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Mason v. York & Cumberland RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1861

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ogle v. KoernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Foxborough Water Supply DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. De Haven & Son Hardware Co. v. SchultzOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Long v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  5. Bates v. SkidmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API