Legal Opinion

Purdy v. Henslee

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1881PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

¡Ruth A Henslee and Lydia L. Hevwood filed their bill in equity, for partition, claiming therein to.be seized in fee of certain undivided interests in the lands therein described. The appellants and numerous others, among whom were the unknown heirs and legal representatives of Thomas Osburn, deceased, were made defendants. Appellants alone appeared to the suit, and they filed what, in the introductory part, professes to be, and what, in its body, in fact appears to be, an answer to the bill. In this they show, by facts stated, that the complainants have no interest whatever in the land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thielman v. CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Reed v. KempIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Mohler v. WiltbergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. McConnel v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Hungate v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Goff v. PriceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Foxborough Water Supply DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Reilly v. ReillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Williams v. BreitungIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Cash v. KruschkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API