Legal Opinion

De Neffe v. Duby

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The plaintiff bases his right to maintain the suit on the allegations that he is a resident and legal voter of the state and is a taxpayer; that he regularly pays a license tax upon one automobile and regularly purchases gasoline in the State, of Oregon for the operation of his gasoline driven motor vehicle, and that during the year 1925 had purchased and paid the tax to the State of Oregon upon more than 100 gallons of gasoline.

The defendants contend that it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to show that, as a taxpayer, he is specifically and specially injured by reason of the conduct and acts…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Cook v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. City of Detroit v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Johns v. City of PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Winslow v. FleischnerOregon Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pioneer Real Estate Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Herald Publishing Co. v. Klamath Falls Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API