Legal Opinion

McCabe v. Goodwin

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1895No. 15817PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was brought under section 3415 of the Political Code, to determine a conflict before the surveyor general respecting the right to purchase from the state certain swamp and overflowed lands in Lake county. August 1, 1860, certificates of purchase were issued by the registrar of the land-office for different portions of the lands to Isaac P. Rice and James E. Allen, respectively, which, by proper transfer and assignments, were afterwards vested in the defendant Goodwin—the one issued to Allen, September 16, 1862, and the one issued to Rice, April 30, 1869. The full amount of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. RoseberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Tubbs v. WilhoitSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Taylor v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Tubbs v. WilhoitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Perri v. BeaumontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Foss v. JohnstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Miller v. EngleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Albert v. AlbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Lasky v. American Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Pardee v. SchanzlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API